Scope
1 area implies 11 topics across 2 modules
You did not pick these
Financial Accounting
Your streams cross into this module, so the work happens there too. That is the part most scoping exercises miss.
The end-to-end
Time-to-Pay
Human Capital Management → Financial Accounting
- 01Capture-to-Approve
- 02Calculate-to-Disburse
- 03Report-to-Complyimplied
Data in and out
What actually crosses the boundary, which way, how often, and what it costs when it stops.
Crosses your scope boundary
Payroll journal←Payroll
Per pay run
General Ledger · without it: Labour cost is missing from the period and the month cannot close.
Employee and position master←Core HR
Continuous
Payroll · without it: Starters are unpaid and leavers keep being paid.
Payroll journal→General Ledger
Per pay run
Payroll · without it: Labour cost is missing from the period.
Net pay file→ABA
Per pay run
Payroll · without it: Staff are not paid.
Interfaces outside the ERP
Contributions→SuperStream gateway and funds
At least quarterly
Superannuation · without it: Superannuation guarantee charge, and it is not tax deductible.
STP event→ATO
On or before each pay day
Single Touch Payroll · without it: Reporting obligation missed; penalties and employee income statements wrong.
Integration points
Every module boundary a stream crosses is an interface. The ones marked straddle your scope — you are changing one side and not the other, which is the interface most often missed at scoping and found during testing.
Human Capital Management→Financial Accounting
Time-to-Pay
One side of this is outside your scope
Human Capital Management→Financial Accounting
Calculate-to-Disburse
One side of this is outside your scope
Human Capital Management→Financial Accounting
Report-to-Comply
One side of this is outside your scope
The order to do it in
Benefits, Time & Attendance
Nothing in scope blocks these — they can start together.
Payroll
Unblocked once the phase above is standing.
Sequence is a delivery judgement rather than a fact about the taxonomy. These are proposals from common tier-1 ordering — argue with them.
Assumed already in place
This scope depends on Core HR without including it. Fine if it is already standing and staying as it is — a gap in the plan otherwise.
Concerns raised
Australian obligations in scope
Everything in scope — 11 topics
The ones you chose, and the ones they brought with them. An implied topic cannot be dropped on its own — it is here because of a pick, and the pick is named.
You picked these — 1
Came with them — 10 you did not pick
Next
This is a diagnosis, not a plan
Build takes the same scope and turns it into the documents somebody has to write — the investment brief, the business case, the plans — starting with what each one needs as an input before its headings can be answered honestly.
Build it →Share this scope
The scope is in the address bar. Send the link and the other person sees the same picture.