Scope
1 area implies 3 topics across 1 module
The end-to-end
Plan-to-Deliver (Project)
Projects and Portfolio (PPM)
Data in and out
What actually crosses the boundary, which way, how often, and what it costs when it stops.
Crosses your scope boundary
Capitalised project costs←Project Costing
Monthly
Asset Management · without it: Capital work in progress never becomes an asset.
The order to do it in
Project Planning
Nothing in scope blocks these — they can start together.
Project Costing
Unblocked once the phase above is standing.
Sequence is a delivery judgement rather than a fact about the taxonomy. These are proposals from common tier-1 ordering — argue with them.
Assumed already in place
This scope depends on General Ledger without including it. Fine if it is already standing and staying as it is — a gap in the plan otherwise.
Concerns raised
Australian obligations in scope
Nothing AU-specific in this scope.
Everything in scope — 3 topics
The ones you chose, and the ones they brought with them. An implied topic cannot be dropped on its own — it is here because of a pick, and the pick is named.
You picked these — 1
Came with them — 2 you did not pick
Next
This is a diagnosis, not a plan
Build takes the same scope and turns it into the documents somebody has to write — the investment brief, the business case, the plans — starting with what each one needs as an input before its headings can be answered honestly.
Build it →Share this scope
The scope is in the address bar. Send the link and the other person sees the same picture.