Scope

1 area implies 7 topics across 2 modules

Procurement+ Add more

You did not pick these

Financial Accounting

Your streams cross into this module, so the work happens there too. That is the part most scoping exercises miss.

The end-to-end

Procure-to-Pay

Supply Chain Management → Financial Accounting

  1. 01Source-to-Contract
  2. 02Requisition-to-Receipt
  3. 03Invoice-to-Payimplied

Data in and out

What actually crosses the boundary, which way, how often, and what it costs when it stops.

Crosses your scope boundary

Sub-ledger postingsAccounts Payable

Continuous

General Ledger \u00b7 without it: Payables detail and the control account disagree.

Net pay fileABA

Per pay run

Payroll \u00b7 without it: Staff are not paid.

Interfaces outside the ERP

Supplier invoicesSupplier e-invoicing, email and portals

Continuous

Accounts Payable \u00b7 without it: Invoices arrive by exception and are keyed by hand.

Remittance adviceSuppliers

Per payment run

Accounts Payable \u00b7 without it: Suppliers cannot reconcile and call the finance team instead.

Purchase ordersSuppliers, EDI and supplier portals

Continuous

Procurement \u00b7 without it: Suppliers work from email and there is no commitment record.

Integration points

Every module boundary a stream crosses is an interface. The ones marked straddle your scope — you are changing one side and not the other, which is the interface most often missed at scoping and found during testing.

Supply Chain ManagementFinancial Accounting

Procure-to-Pay

One side of this is outside your scope

Supply Chain ManagementFinancial Accounting

Requisition-to-Receipt

One side of this is outside your scope

The order to do it in

01

Procurement

Nothing in scope blocks these — they can start together.

02

Accounts Payable

Unblocked once the phase above is standing.

Sequence is a delivery judgement rather than a fact about the taxonomy. These are proposals from common tier-1 ordering — argue with them.

Assumed already in place

This scope depends on General Ledger without including it. Fine if it is already standing and staying as it is — a gap in the plan otherwise.

Concerns raised

Australian obligations in scope

Everything in scope — 7 topics, 6 you did not pick

Next

This is a diagnosis, not a plan

Build takes the same scope and turns it into the documents somebody has to write — the investment brief, the business case, the plans — starting with what each one needs as an input before its headings can be answered honestly.

Build it →

Share this scope

The scope is in the address bar. Send the link and the other person sees the same picture.